Article

Comparison of volatile compounds in juices and wines of white grape cultivars Cheongsoo, Chardonnay, and Riesling

김현일, 허윤영, 정성민, 임동준, 김수진*http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4793-5113
Hyun Il Kim, Youn Young Hur, Sung Min Jung, Dong Jun Im, Su Jin Kim*http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4793-5113
Author Information & Copyright
국립원예특작과학원 과수과
Fruit Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Wanju 55365Korea
* E-mail: himssem@korea.kr Tel: 82-63-238-6750, Fax: 82-63-238-6705

Copyright ⓒ The Korean Society of Food Preservation. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Feb 02, 2018; Revised: Feb 21, 2018; Accepted: Mar 16, 2018

Abstract

The study compared the juice and wine odorants of the Cheongsoo grape cultivar with those of Chardonnay and Reisling wines. The volatile compounds of the three grape varieties were analyzed using headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The most common volatile compounds in the juices from the three cultivars were terpenes, C13-norisoprenoids, etones, alcohols, and aldehydes. Terpenes were established as the most abundant group of volatiles in Cheongsoo grape juice, where as aldehydes predominated in Chardonnay and Riesling juices. Forty-two volatile compounds (acids, alcohols, esters, and others) were detected in the three white wines. The concentration of esters was about four times higher in Cheongsoo wine than in Chardonnay and Riesling wines. Five esters found in the Cheongsoo wine, namely, isoamyl acetate, ethyl butanoate, ethyl hexanoate, ethyl octanoate, and ethyl decanoate, exhibited high odor activity values (OAV) of >1. Furthermore, only Cheongsoo wine had a high OAV for isoamyl acetate odorant, which is associated with banana and sweet aromas. Therefore, the abundant and varied esters are believed to be key volatile fruity/sweet odorants in Cheongsoo wine.

요약

본 연구는 청수 품종의 과실과 와인의 향기 성분을 주요 화이트 와인 품종인 샤르도네와 리슬링 품종과 비교하기 위해 향기성분을 headspace-solid phase microextraction 분석법으로 확인하였다. 세 포도 품종 모두 과실의 주된 향기의 구성 성분은 terpenes, C13-norisoprenoids, ketones, alcohol과 aldehydes였다. 청수 품종의 과실에서는 향기성분 중 terpenes이 가장 많았으며 샤르도네와 리슬링 품종의 과실에서는 aldehydes의 함량이 높게 나타났다. 세 품종의 와인에서는 42 종류의 향기성분이 검출되었다. 청수 와인에서는 샤르도네와 리슬링 와인보다 ester의 함량이 약 4배 이상 높았으며 주된 ester 물질은 isoamyl acetate, ethyl butanoate, ethyl hexanoate, ethyl octanoate과 ethyl decanoate였으며 이 물질들은 OAV 값(odor activity value)이 1 이상으로 나타났다. 그 중에서 isoamyl acetate는 청수 와인에서만 확인된 물질로 odor descriptor가 바나나 향 및 달콤한 향을 나타낸다. 따라서 청수 와인의 과일 향과 달콤한 향은 다양하고 높은 ester 화합물 함량에 의한 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords: Cheongsoo; volatile compounds; headspace-solid phase microextraction; gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Introduction

Production of high quality wines requires the cultivation of wine-exclusive grape varieties with excellent wine-specific properties such as high sugar content, appropriate acid content and good flavor. In particular, wine aroma is one of the most important factors to determine the character and quality of wine. Wine flavors dependent on the presence of aromatic compounds originating from grapes, the fermentation process, ageing, and storage. Wine volatiles include as many as 800 different compounds detected thus far, represented mainly by alcohols, esters, aldehydes and ketones (1). Grape volatiles include a great number of compounds, among which monoterpenes, C13-norisoprenoids, alcohols, esters and carbonyls represent some of the main groups (2). The profile of volatile compounds in wine depends on many factors such as geographical origin, grape variety, vintage, as well as growing conditions (3-8). The great variety of volatile compounds, all with different polarities, volatilities and a wide range of concentrations, are responsible for the complexity of wine bouquet and ensure the specific character of different varietals (9). The role of these volatile compounds is related to their odor perception threshold, i.e. the concentration / threshold ratio, known as the odor activity value (OAV) that enables us to estimate the contribution of volatile compounds found in grapes and wines (10).

Cultivars of Vitis vinifera form the basis of most wines produced around the world. The V. vinifera cultivar Chardonnay is renowned for the production of high-quality French white wines and champagne (11). Riesling is the second most widely planted aromatic variety of white wine grapes, and is used to produce varietal wines with aroma attributes that include stone fruits, flowers and wet stones (12). The majority of wine-only varieties introduced in Korea are V. vinifera species that usually winter kill at around -2 to -3℃ (13). Additionally, V. vinifera is not suitable for hot and humid summer environment, which results in poor quality grapes. However, rainfall in the Republic of Korea exceeds 1,000 mm a year, with almost half of this quantity falling during June and July. Further, the lowest temperature in Korea during the period 2000-2016 was -21.6℃ (14). As a consequence, the V. vinifera cultivars have to be cultivated in greenhouses in order to avoid winterkill in Korea. Therefore, new wine cultivars are in high demand in Korea.

Cheongsoo grape variety was produced as a plant cross between Seibel 9110 and Himrod Seedless grape varieties at the National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science (NIHHS) in Korea in 1993. Cheongsoo is a highly appreciated grape variety with a golden color and a pleasant fruit flavor. In addition, Cheongsoo is resistant to winter cold and mildew (15). In a previous study, the changes in volatile compounds in Cheongsoo wine were analysed at different stages of ripening (16). Cheongsoo wine was found to possess a high content of ester compounds that give rise to strong sweet flavors such as pineapple, banana and pear. However, the differences between Cheongsoo and other white wine varietals produced from grapes grown in Korea have not been analysed to date. Therefore, in order to understand the volatile characteristics of Cheongsoo grapes, it is necessary to compare it with renowned white grape varieties such as Chardonnay and Riesling. Therefore, the objectives of the present study were to identify the volatile compounds present in grapes and wine produced from three white wine grape varietals Cheongsoo, Chardonnay and Riesling using headspace-solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

Materials and Methods

Reagents

Sodium chloride (NaCl) and 4-nonanol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Korea Ltd. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Calcium chloride (CaCl2) was purchased from Kanto Chemical Co., INC. (Tokyo, Japan). All reagents used were of analytical grade.

Plant material

Three grape cultivars, Cheongsoo, Chardonnay, and Riesling were cultivated in the orchards at the National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science in Korea. Cheongsoo Chardonnay and Riesling Grapes were harvested on 23 August, 25 August and 31 August, 2016, respectively. All samples were frozen at -20℃ prior to analysis. Before isolating the volatile compounds, the grape samples were defrosted at 5℃ under nitrogen atmosphere.

Winemaking procedure

The wine making process followed a modified Chang’s method (16) and micro-vinification method. Grapes were removed from grape bunches and potassium metabisulfite (K2S2O5) was added at a concentration of 200 mg/kg. Before fermentation, grape (500 g) must was adjusted to 22 °Brix using table sugar. Five hours after the addition of potassium metabisulfite, active yeasts were inoculated into grape must at a ratio of 0.02% (w/w). The yeast strain, Saccharomyces bayanus (EC-1118;Canada) was used for fermentation in all winemaking processes. The grapes were first fermented for two weeks at a constant temperature of 15℃ in a 750 mL DURAN® laboratory bottle equipped with an airlock. After the initial fermentation, the fermented residual sugar and sediment were isolated from wine. The isolated wine was subjected to a second round of fermentation at a constant temperature of 15℃ for 1 week, after which the prepared wine samples were analysed.

HS-SPME conditions

A SPME fiber coated with divinylbenzene/carboxen/ polydimethylsiloxane (50/30 μm, DVB/CAR/PDMS) (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) was used for the analysis owing to its high sensitivity for odorants and good reproducibility in grapes (17). Samples of grape berries (50 g) with CaCl2 (1 g) were defrosted and homogenised using a commercial blender. CaCl2 was added to inhibit enzyme activity prior to crushing (18). The homogenized samples were clarified by centrifugation at 2,700 ×g for 10 min at 4℃. A sample of the supernatant (25 mL) or fermentation-finished wine (25 mL) was transferred into a capped 50 mL solid-phase microextraction vial, and 3 g of NaCl and 20 μL of internal standard (4-nonanol in EtOH, 1 mg/mL) were added. Samples were heated at 70℃ in an automated heating block (Wise Therm®, HB-48P). After 20 min of equilibration, the SPME fiber was manually inserted into the sample vial headspace. After 20 min, the fiber was withdrawn and introduced into the GC injection port for desorption at 250℃ and maintained for 10 min in splitless mode. Samples of three different batches of grapes were examined in triplicate. All samples were examined in triplicate.

GC-MS analysis

An Agilent gas chromatograph model 6890N coupled to an Agilent 5975 series mass selective detector (Agilent technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to perform the analysis. Volatile compounds were separated on an HP-INNOWAX capillary column (30 m×0.32 mm×0.25 μm; Agilent technologies), with purified helium as the carrier gas, at a constant flow rate of 2 mL/min. Desorption of the DVB/CAR/PDMS fiber was carried out for 10 min in the GC injection port at 250℃. The oven temperature was held at 40℃ for 5 min, increased to 220℃ at a rate of 3℃/min and finally held at 220℃ for 5 min. The injector and source temperature were set at 250℃ and 230℃, respectively. The mass detector was operated in electron impact ionization mode at a voltage of 70 eV, with the range set at 50-700 m/z. Selected GC-MS peaks were identified based on the comparison of mass spectra with the NIST11 (Agilent, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) mass spectral database. Content of all compounds was quantified relative to the known concentration of 4-nonanol internal standard.

Statistical analysis

A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to identify statistically significant differences between samples. A principal components analysis (PCA) was performed to evaluate and perform a reduction in the number of attributes to a smaller set of underlying variables based on patterns of correlations between original variables. The R Commander (version 2.13.0, A Basic-Statistics GUI for R statistical software package; McMaster University, Ontario, Canada) was employed for this analysis where statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

Results and Discussion

Volatile composition of grape berries

The major volatile compounds found in the juice extracted from the three grape berries were terpenes, C13-norisoprenoids, ketones, alcohols and aldehydes (Fig. 1). However, the % content of the various volatile compounds varied as a function of grape cultivar. The most abundant volatiles in Cheongsoo grapes were terpene compounds, while aldehydes predominated in Chardonnay and Riesling grapes. Terpenes are known to play an important role in grape berries as they are responsible for the floral notes of aromatic grape varieties such as Gewürztraminer, Sauvignon Blanc and the Muscat family (19-21). Currently, about 50 monoterpene compounds that occur in grapes and wines most commonly have been identified (22). Free and bound glycoside terpenes can be found in grapes. Specifically, odorless precursors (bound fraction) present in grapes are transformed into odor-active forms (free fraction) during the winemaking process (23). Therefore, quantification of bound glycosides can be used as a useful index by winemakers for the determination of wine aroma and character (22). Recently, it has been reported that diendiol II (3,7-dimethylocta-1,7-dien-3,6-diol) is generated enzymatically from linalool in grape berries (24). However, the biosynthesis and oxidative transformation of monoterpenes in grapes remain largely unexplored in spite of their importance as a volatile wine compounds. Taking into consideration of the high content of terpene, Cheongsoo wine possesses quite a strong characteristic aroma compared to Chardonnay and Riesling wines.

kjfp-25-2-165-g001
Fig. 1. The % content of different groups of volatile compounds detected as a function of grape cultivar.
Download Original Figure
Volatile composition of wines

PCA based on GC-MS data was performed to compare the content of volatile compounds as a function of grape cultivar (Fig. 2). PCA is a powerful tool for the interpretation of multivariate statistical analysis. The three white wines examined in this study were found to adopt three overlapping, yet distinct zones. Cheongsoo wine was identified by the presence of isoamyl acetate, ethyl hexanoate, ethyl octanoate and ethyl decanoate. In contrast, Chardonnay wine was distinguished by the ethyl heptanoate, methyl-2-hydroxybenxoate, 3-hexen-1-ol and 1-heptanol content. Finally, Riesling wine was categorised by 2-methyl-hexanoic acid, trans-(2-chlorovinyl)methyldiethoxysilane and 1,1,6,-trimethyl-1,2-dihydronapthalene (TDN).

kjfp-25-2-165-g002
Fig. 2. PC1 vs. PC2 scatter plot of the main sources of variability between Cheongsoo, Chardonnay and Riesling white wine varietals, where (a) shows the distinction between different wines (n=3) and (b) the relationship between the 42 volatile compounds* detected. *Numbers in (b) represent: 1, ethyl acetate; 2, isoamyl acetate; 3, hexyl acetate; 4, ethyl butanoate; 5, ethyl hexanoate; 6, ethyl heptanoate; 7, ethyl octanoate; 8, methyl formate; 9, hexyl propionate; 10, ethyl decanoate; 11, ethyl trans-4-decenoate; 12, ethyl-9-decenoate; 13, methyl-2-hydroxybenxoate; 14, methyl N-hydroxybenzenecarboximidoate; 15, phenethyl acetate; 16, ethyl dodecanoate; 17, 1-propanol; 18, isobutyl alcohol; 19, 1-butanol; 20, isoamyl alcohol; 21, isohexyl alcohol; 22, 3-ethyl-1-butanol; 23, 1-hexanol; 24, (E)-3-hexen-1-ol; 25, 3-hexen-1-ol; 26, 3-ethoxy-1-propanol; 27, 1-heptanol; 28, (+)-1,3-butanediol; 29, 3-(methylthio)-1-propanol; 30, 2-phenylethanol; 31, 2-methyl-octanoic acid; 32, 2-methyl-hexanoic acid; 33, hexanoic acid; 34, octanoic acid; 35, n-decanoic acid; 36, benzaldehyde; 37, α-ionene; 38, ethyldihydroxyborane; 39, benzyol bromide; 40, trans-(2-chlorovinyl) methyldiethoxysilane; 41, vanillin; tert-butyldimethylsilyl ether; 42, 1,1,6,-trimethyl-1,2-dihydronapthalene (TDN).
Download Original Figure

In the present study, 16 ester volatile compounds were detected in three white wine varietals (Table 1). The concentration of esters was about four times higher in Cheongsoo than in Chardonnay and Riesling wines. Five esters found in Cheongsoo wine, namely isoamyl acetate, ethyl butanoate, ethyl hexanoate, ethyl octanoate and ethyl decanoate, exhibited a high OAV of >1. In contrast, only four and two esters displayed a high OAV (>1) in Chardonnay and Riesling wines, respectively. Additionally, the isoamyl acetate (OAV=16.28) odorant associated with banana and sweet aroma, was detected only in Cheongsoo wine. In several studies, isoamyl acetate was one of the esters that contribute most significantly to the aroma profile of white and red wines. This compound was also considered to be one of the most powerful odorants and key fermentation volatiles of Zalema white wine, 52 young red wines and Vitis vinifera cv. Pinotage and Sake (10,25-27). The esters produced enzymatically during yeast fermentation are the most important group of aromatic compounds in wines. In particular, ethyl esters formed from medium-chain fatty acids are responsible for the fruity character of fermented beverages, and thus constitute a vital group of aromatic compounds in both wine and beer (28,29). In our results, ethyl hexanoate and ethyl octanoate exhibited a high OAV of >1 in all three wines (Table 1). However, the concentration of ethyl hexanoate in Cheongsoo wine was about six and three times higher than its content in Chardonnay and Riesling wines, respectively. Furthermore, the concentration of ethyl octanoate was about five and eight times higher in Cheongsoo wine than in Chardonnay and Riesling wines. While ethyl decanoate was detected in all white wines examined, it exhibited a high OAV of >1 only in Cheongsoo wine. In contrast, ethyl butanoate, which displayed an OAV of above 1 was detected in both Cheongsoo and Chardonnay wines. Finally, ethyl heptanoate was detected with a high OAV (>1) only in Chardonnay wine. In summary, five esters were found to be the predominant fruity and sweet volatile odorant compounds in Cheongsoo wine.

Table 1. . Esters detected in Cheongsoo, Chardonnay and Riesling white wines
Compounds CAS1) RT2) Cheongsoo Chardonnay Riesling OTV5)(μg/L) Odor descriptor
Conc.3)(μg/L) OAV4) Conc.(μg/L) OAV Conc.(μg/L) OAV
Esters
1 Ethyl Acetate 141-78-6 2.306 0.00a6) -7) 226.61a <1 0.00a - 12,000y pineapple
2 Isoamyl acetate 123-92-2 7.093 488.28a 16.28 0.00b - 0.00b - 30z banana, sweet
3 Hexyl acetate 142-92-7 12.372 153.66a <1 16.08b <1 0.00b - 670x fruity, pear
4 Ethyl butanoate 105-54-4 4.634 52.40a 2.62 95.08a 4.75 0.00a - 20z strawberry
5 Ethyl hexanoate 123-66-0 10.806 885.46a 110.68 140.91b 17.61 274.56b 34.32 8y fruity, apple
6 Ethyl heptanoate 106-30-9 15.402 0.00a - 3.18a 1.45 0.00a - 2.2y fruity, apple
7 Ethyl octanoate 106-32-1 19.198 2169.44a 433.89 397.22b 79.44 274.01b 54.80 5z sweet, pear
8 Methyl formate 107-31-3 21.165 96.67a - 36.49a - 198.55a -
9 Hexyl propionate 2445-76-3 24.501 0.00a - 0.00a - 68.10a -
10 Ethyl decanoate 110-38-3 27.416 963.99a 4.82 185.77b <1 51.42b <1 200z fruity, grape
11 Ethyl trans-4-decenoate 76649-16-6 29.406 100.33a - 21.82ab - 0.00b -
12 Ethyl 9-decenoate 67233-91-4 29.503 0.00a - 6.97a - 0.00a - 100y rose
13 Methyl 2-hydroxybenzoate 119-36-8 32.109 0.00b - 8.95a - 3.42b - Nf8) minty, sweet
14 Methyl N-hydroxybenzenecarboximidoate NIST8),222866 33.419 500.87a - 171.25a - 653.94a -
15 Phenethyl acetate 103-45-7 33.831 105.79a - 63.81a - 62.76a - 250w pleasant, floral
16 Ethyl dodecanoate 106-33-2 34.857 60.11a - 0.00a - 10.75a - 3,500y sweet, fruity
Subtotal 5577.02 1374.14 1597.51

1)CAS, chemical abstract service.

2)RT, retention time.

3)Conc., concentration.

4)OAV was calculated by dividing the concentration by odor threshold value of the compound.

5)OTV: zFerreira et al., 2000 (27); yWelke et al., 2014 (32); xJiang & Zhang, 2010(33); wLi et al., 2008 (34).

6)Different letters within each rows indicates statistical differences (n=3, p<0.05).

7)Not found.

8)National institute of standards and technology.

Download Excel Table

Fourteen alcohol volatile compounds were detected in three white wine varietals (Table 2). At a concentration of 6.0-10.5 mg/L, alcohols represented the largest group of volatile compounds in the three examined white wine varietals. Nevertheless, the influence of alcohols as odorants in wine was lower than those of esters as a result of their high odor threshold value (OTV). In fact, with the exception of 1-hexanol, the alcohols were detected lower than their OTVs in quantities. In addition, alcohols with six carbon atoms, which supply vegetal and herbaceous nuances to wine, usually exert a negative effect on wine quality when present at concentration above their OTV (30). In our work, 3-hexan -1-ol with an OAV <1 was detected in Chardonnay wine only, and can be thus used to distinguish Chardonnay wine from others.

Table 2. . Alcohol compounds detected in Cheongsoo, Chardonnay and Riesling white wines
Compounds CAS1) RT2) Cheongsoo Chardonnay Riesling OTV5)(μg/L) Odor descriptor
Conc.3)(μg/L) OAV4) Conc.(μg/L) OAV Conc.(μg/L) OAV
Alcohols
17 1-Propanol 71-23-8 5.461 182.00a6) <1 212.57a <1 208.93a <1 306,000z ripe fruit
18 Isobutyl alcohol 78-83-1 7.520 32.87a <1 0.00b -7) 292.55ab <1 75,000z alcohol
19 1-Butanol 71-36-3 9.351 6.10a <1 23.39a <1 0.00a - 150,000z medicinal
20 Isoamyl alcohol 123-51-3 12.012 3,846.71a <1 4,510.33a <1 7,056.47a <1 30,000x harsh, bitter
21 Isohexyl alcohol 626-89-1 15.406 19.77ab <1 2.31a <1 0.00b - 50,000z almond
22 3-Ethyl-1-butanol 589-35-5 15.872 51.32a - 16.70b - 47.55b -
23 1-Hexanol 107-02-8 16.881 160.20ab 1.46 221.79a 2.02 179.33b 1.63 110z herbaceous
24 (E)-3-Hexen-1-ol 928-97-2 17.267 7.35a <1 0.00a - 0.00a - 400y green, floral
25 3-Hexen-1-ol 544-12-7 17.354 0.00b - 15.64a - 0.00b -
26 3-Ethoxy-1-propanol 111-35-3 17.750 0.00a - 6.11a <1 0.00a - 100z fruity
27 1-Heptanol 111-70-6 20.828 3.46b <1 36.80a <1 2.84b <1 1,000y grape, sweet
28 (+)-1,3-Butanediol 24621-61-2 24.327 51.26a - 70.75a - 58.62a -
29 3-(Methylthio)-1-propanol 505-10-2 30.722 0.00a - 5.15a <1 8.84a <1 500y rubber
30 2-Phenylethanol 60-12-8 37.225 1,700.98a <1 1,240.25a <1 2,632.84a <1 200,000z rose, honey
Subtotal 6,062.01 6,361.80 10,487.96

1)CAS, chemical abstract service.

2)RT, retention time.

3)Conc., concentration.

4)OAV was calculated by dividing the concentration by odor threshold value of the compound.

5)OTV: zWelke et al., 2014 (32); yJiang & Zhang, 2010(33); xLi et al., 2008 (34).

6)Different letters within each rows indicates statistical differences (n=3, p<0.05).

7)Not found.

Download Excel Table

Five acids and 7 other volatile compounds were detected in three white wine varietals (Table 3). C6-C10 fatty acids at a concentration of 4 to 10 mg/L impart mild and pleasant aroma to wine. At levels beyond 20 mg/L, however, their impact on wine becomes negative (31). In this study, fatty acids were found to be present in the wine samples only in trace amounts. C13-norisoprenoid components such as α-ionene were detected with high OAV (>1) only in Cheongsoo wine. In contrast, 2-methyl-hexanoic acid and TDN were detected in Riesling wine only. These volatile compounds may contribute to the distinction of Riesling wine from non-Riesling wines (12).

Table 3. . Acid and other compounds detected in Cheongsoo, Chardonnay and Riesling white wines
Compounds CAS1) RT2) Cheongsoo Chardonnay Riesling OTV5)(μg/L) Odor descriptor
Conc.3)(μg/L) OAV4) Conc.(μg/L) OAV Conc.(μg/L) OAV
Acids
31 2-Methyl-octanoic acid 3004-93-1 29.411 0.00a6) -7) 22.32a - 0.00a -
32 2-Methyl-hexanoic acid 4536-23-6 29.536 0.00a - 0.00a - 53.49a -
33 Hexanoic acid 142-62-1 35.415 122.55a <1 0.00a - 0.00a - 420z cheese, fatty
34 Octanoic Acid 124-07-2 42.335 247.02a <1 17.39b <1 0.00b <1 500z fatty, rancid
35 n-Decanoic acid 334-48-5 48.704 7.74a 1.29 0.00a - 0.00a - 6y fatty, rancid
Subtotal 377.31 39.70 53.49
Others
36 Benzaldehyde 100-52-7 23.041 0.00a - 3.45a <1 0.00a - 2,000y almond
37 α-Ionene 475-03-6 18.658 4.21a 1.62 0.00a - 0.00a - 2.6z sweet, fruity
38 Ethyldihydroxyborane 4433-63-0 7.023 98.19a - 76.95a - 0.00a -
39 Benzoyl bromide 618-32-6 14.551 27.42a - 69.91a - 70.50a -
40 trans-(2-Chlorovinyl)methyldiethoxysilane NIST8),139969 18.981 0.00b - 28.50ab - 118.91a -
41 Vanillin, tert-butyldimethylsilyl ether NIST,352846 23.637 12.57a - 17.61a - 62.92a -
42 TDN NIST,357258 30.957 0.00a - 0.00a - 19.44a 9.72 2x kerosene
Subtotal 142.39 196.43 271.78

1)CAS, chemical abstract service.

2)RT, retention time.

3)Conc., concentration.

4)OAV was calculated by dividing the concentration by odor threshold value of the compound.

5)OTV: zFerreira et al., 2000; yWelke et al., 2014; xSacks et al., 2012.

6)Different letters within each rows indicates statistical differences (n=3, p<0.05).

7)Not found.

8)National institute of standards and technology.

Download Excel Table

This is the first study comparing the volatile compounds found in white grape varieties grown in Korea. The obtained analytical results allowed us to determine the content of major volatile components in Cheongsoo, Chardonnay and Riesling grape cultivars. The differences detected in the content of volatile components were successfully used to distinguish grapes and wines associated with the three varietals. The concentration of terpenes, which are known to determine the wine aroma after fermentation, was found to be about eight and two times higher in Cheongsoo grapes than in Chardonnay and Riesling grapes, respectively. Furthermore, the quantity of odorants in Cheongsoo wine exceeded those found in Chardonnay and Riesling wines. In particular, esters such as isoamyl acetate, ethyl butanoate, ethyl hexanoate, ethyl octanoate and ethyl decanoate were detected in Cheongsoo wine with an OAV of >1. These ester components are key odorants in wine associated with fruity and sweet aroma. Therefore, we anticipate that Cheongsoo grape variety can be employed in Korea as a new wine grape for winemaking owing to its high content of sweet and fruity odorants.

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out with the support of the Cooperative Research Programme for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project No. 01272902), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

References

1.

EbelerSE. 2001; Analytical chemistry: unlocking the secrets of wine flavor. Food Rev Int. 17:45-64

2.

DieguezSC, LoisLC, GomezEF, de la PenaLG. 2003; Aromatic Composition of the Vitis grape Albarino. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 36:585-590.

3.

ArozarenaI, CaspA, MarinR, NavarroM. 2000; Multivariate differentiation of Spanish red wines according to region and variety. J Sci Food Agric. 80:1909-1917

4.

AlvarezI, AleixandreJL, GarciaMJ, CaspA, ZunicaL. 2003; Geographical differentiation of white wines from three subzones of the designation of origin Valencia. Eur Food Res Technol. 217:173-179

5.

MartiMP, BustoO, GuaschJ. 2004; Application of a headspace mass spectrometry system to the differentiation and classification of wines according to their origin, variety and ageing. J Chromatogr . 1057:211-217.

6.

CozzolinoD, SmythHE, CynkarW, DambergsRG, GishenM. 2005; Usefulness of chemometrics and mass spectrometry-based electronic nose to classify Australian white wines by their varietal origin. Talanta. 68:382-387

7.

SetkovaL, RisticevicS, PawliszynJ. 2007; Rapid headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatographic-time-of-flight mass spectrometric method for qualitative profiling of ice wine volatile fraction II: classification of Canadian and Czech ice wines using statistical evaluation of the data. J Chromatogr A. 1147:224-240.

8.

JuradoJM, BallesterosO, AlcazarA, PablosF, MartinMJ, VilchezJL, NavalonA. 2008; Differentiation of certified brands of origins of Spanish white wines by HS-SPME-GC and chemometrics. Anal Bioanal Chem. 390:961-970

9.

CamaraJS, AlvesMA, MarquesJC. 2006; Multivariate analysis for the classification and differentiation of Madeira wines according to main grape varieties. Talanta. 68:1512-1521

10.

Gomez-MiguezMJ, CachoJF, FerreiraV, VicarioIM, HerediaFJ. 2007; Volatile components of Zalema white wines. Food Chem. 100:1464-1473.

11.

SimpsonRF, MillerG. 1984; Aroma composition of chardonnay wine. Vitis. 23:143-158.

12.

SacksGL, GatesMJ, FerryFX, LavinEH, KurtzAJ, AcreeTE. 2012; Sensory threshold of 1,1,6-Trimethyl-1,2-dihydronaphthalene (TDN) and concentrations in young Riesling and non-Riesling wine. J Agric Food Chem. 60:2998-3004

13.

WolfTK, CookMK. 1994; Cold hardiness of dormant buds of grape cultivars: comparison of thermal analysis and field survival. HortScience. 29:1453-1455.

14.

Korea Meteorological Administration. https://data.kma.go.kr/data/grnd/selectAsosRltmList.do?pgmNo=36 (accessed March 2017)

Korea Meteorological Administrationhttps://data.kma.go.kr/data/grnd/selectAsosRltmList.do?pgmNo=36 (accessed March 2017)

15.

LeeDK, SuhHS, ParkKS, LeeCH, MoonJY, YaeBW, HwangHS, KimJH, KimJC, LeeJC, KimYK. 1994; Cheongsoo a new mid-season ripening table grape cultivar with high quality. Korean J Hortic Sci. 12:144-145.

16.

ChangEH, JungSM, HurYY. 2014; Changes in the aromatic composition of grape cv. Cheongsoo wine depending on the degree of grape ripening. Food Sci Biotechnol. 23:1761-1771

17.

PalomoES, Diaz-MarotoMC, Perez-CoelloMS. 2005; Rapid determination of volatile compounds in grapes by HS-SPME coupled with GC-MS. Talanta. 66:1152-1157.

18.

SunSY, JiangWG, ZhaoYP. 2009; Characterization of the aroma-active compounds in five sweet cherry cultivars grown in Yantai (China). Flavour Fragrance J. 25:206-213.

19.

MaraisJ. 1983; Terpenes in the aroma of grapes and wines: a review. S Afr J Enol Vitic. 4:49-58.

20.

LuanF, MosandlA, GubeschM, WustM. 2006; Enantioselective analysis of monoterpenes in different grape varieties during berry ripening using stir bar sorptive extraction-and solid phase extraction-enantioselective-multidimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 1112:369-374.

21.

Kok D (2011) Influences of pre-and post-veraison cluster thinning treatments on grape composition variables and monoterpene levels of Vitis Vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon Blanc. J Food Agric Environ, 9, 22-26

KokD. 2011; Influences of pre-and post-veraison cluster thinning treatments on grape composition variables and monoterpene levels of Vitis Vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon Blanc. J Food Agric Environ. 9:22-26.

22.

CamaraJS, AlvesMA, MarquesJC. 2007; Classification of Boal, Malvazia, Sercial and Verdelho wines based on terpenoid patterns. Food Chem. 101:475-484.

23.

PedrozaMA, ZalacainA, LaraJF, SalinasMR. 2010; Global grape aroma potential and its individual analysis by SBSE-GC-MS. Food Res Int. 43:1003-1008

24.

Luan F, Hampel D, Mosandl A, Wust M (2004) Enantioselective analysis of free and glycosidically bound monoterpene polyols in Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Morio Muscat and Muscat Ottonel: evidence for an oxidative monoterpene metabolism in grapes. J Agric Food Chem, 52, 2036-2041

LuanF, HampelD, MosandlA, WustM. 2004; Enantioselective analysis of free and glycosidically bound monoterpene polyols in Vitis vinifera L. cvs. Morio Muscat and Muscat Ottonel: evidence for an oxidative monoterpene metabolism in grapes. J Agric Food Chem. 52:2036-2041

25.

van Wyk CJ, Augustyn OPH, de Wet P, Joubert WA (1979) Isoamyl acetate-a key fermentation volatile of wines of Vitis vinifera cv Pinotage. Am J Enol Viticult, 30, 167-173

van WykCJ, AugustynOPH, de WetP, JoubertWA. 1979; Isoamyl acetate-a key fermentation volatile of wines of Vitis vinifera cv Pinotage. Am J Enol Viticult. 30:167-173.

26.

AshidaS, IchikawaE, SuginamiK, ImayasuS. 1987; Isolation and application of mutants producing sufficient isoamyl acetate, a sake flavor component. Agric Biol Chem Tokyo. 51:2061-2065

27.

FerreiraV, LopezR, CachoJF. 2000; Quantitative determination of the odorants of young red wines from different grape varieties. J Sci Food Agric. 80:1659-1667

28.

VerstrepenKJ, DerdelinckxG, DufourJP, WinderickxJ, TheveleinJM, PretoriusIS, DelvauxFR. 2003; Flavor-active esters: adding fruitiness to beer. J Biosci Bioeng. 96:110-118

29.

SumbyKM, GrbinPB, JiranekV. 2010; Microbial modulation of aromatic esters in wine: current knowledge and future prospects. Food Chem. 121:1-16

30.

FerreiraV, FernandezP, PenaC, EscuderoA, CachoJF. 1995; Investigation on the role played by fermentation esters in the aroma of young Spanish wines by multivariate analysis. J Sci Food Agric. 67:381-392

31.

ShinoharaT. 1985; Gas chromatographic analysis of volatile fatty acids in wines. Agri Biol Chem. 49:2211-2212

32.

WelkeJE, ZanusM, LazzarottoM, ZiniCA. 2014; Quantitative analysis of headspace volatile compounds using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography and their contribution to the aroma of Chardonnay wine. Food Res Int. 59:85-99

33.

JiangB, ZhangZ. 2010; Volatile compounds of young wines from Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Gernischet and Chardonnay varieties grown in the Loess Plateau region of China. Molecules. 15:9184-9196

34.

LiH, TaoYS, WangH, ZhangL. 2008; Impact odorants of Chardonnay dry white wine from Changli county (China). Eur Food Res Technol. 227:287-292

Journal Title Change

We announce that the title of our journal and related information were changed as below from January, 2024.

 

Before (~2023.12)

After (2024.01~)

Journal Title

Korean Journal of Food Preservation

Food Science and Preservation

Journal Abbreviation

Korean J. Food Preserv.

Food Sci. Preserv.

eISSN

2287-7428

3022-5485

pISSN

1738-7248

3022-5477

Journal Homepage

https://www.ekosfop.or.kr

Same


I don't want to open this window for a day.