Food Science and Preservation
The Korean Society of Food Preservation
Research Article

Comparative analysis of storage quality and metabolite profiles in onion bulbs according to cultivar and cultivation region

Dong-Shin Kim1,,*https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4286-0394, Jeong Gu Lee1,https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1684-0550, Do-Gyun Park1https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5763-3405, Jinhee Lee1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6434-3382, Yeo Eun Yun1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0153-9430, Yeon Jin Jang1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8060-7704, Sooyeon Lim1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8929-3377, Jae-Han Cho1https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3830-1881, Jinsu Lee1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6475-5213, JiWon Han2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5467-9328
1Postharvest Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Wanju 55365, Korea
2Allium Vegetable Research Center, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Muan 58545, Korea
*Corresponding author Dong-Shin Kim Tel: +82-63-238-6543, E-mail: dskim3309@korea.kr

These authors contributed equally to this study.

Citation: Kim DS, Lee JG, Park DG, Lee JH, Yun YE, Jang YJ, Lim S, Cho JH, Lee JS, Han JW. Comparative analysis of storage quality and metabolite profiles in onion bulbs according to cultivar and cultivation region. Food Sci. Preserv., 32(5), 776-789 (2025)

Copyright © The Korean Society of Food Preservation. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jul 18, 2025; Revised: Aug 14, 2025; Accepted: Aug 16, 2025

Published Online: Oct 31, 2025

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of storage on the quality characteristics and metabolite profiles of onion (Allium cepa L.) bulbs from different cultivars and cultivation regions. Physiological traits such as respiration rate, weight loss, and firmness showed a general decline during storage, with only slight but statistically significant differences observed among cultivars and regions. Metabolomic analysis using UPLC-Q-TOF MS combined with multivariate statistics revealed that sugars, organic acids, amino acids, and organosulfur compounds were significantly altered over the storage period. In particular, sucrose and maltopentose increased by up to 3.09- and 4.65-fold, respectively, while glutamyl-S-allylcysteine and glutathione glycylmethyl ester showed increases of 7.22- and 8.12-fold, respectively, especially in the ‘Terius’ cultivar. These compounds are involved in structural degradation, antioxidant defense, and flavor development, reflecting cultivar- and region-specific metabolic regulation. The findings provide insights into the biochemical mechanisms underlying storage-related changes and may inform strategies for improved postharvest management and quality preservation of onions.

Keywords: onion; cultivar; cultivation region; metabolomics; UPLC-Q-TOF MS

1. Introduction

Onion (Allium cepa L.) is one of the most widely cultivated and consumed vegetables worldwide, recognized for its characteristic flavor and various health benefits (Stoica et al., 2023). In 2022, global onion production reached approximately 111 million tonnes, with India (28.6%), China (22.2%), Egypt (3.3%), and the United States (2.64%) being the top producers (FAO, 2023; Safari et al., 2024). Onions are mainly cultivated in temperate and subtropical regions (Park et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2020). In Korea, mid- to late-maturing cultivars are predominantly grown in Jeollanam-do and Gyeongsangnam-do (Park et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2020). Onions are rich in flavonoids, organosulfur compounds, and fructooligosaccharides, which are known to exhibit antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and cardioprotective effects (Ren and Zhou, 2021; Sagar et al., 2022; Zhao et al., 2021). In addition, due to their distinctive flavor and nutritional value, onions are extensively used in culinary applications, including soups, stews, stir-fries, and sauces, as well as in the development of functional food products such as powders and beverages (Griffiths et al., 2002; Stoica et al., 2023). Due to these beneficial properties and their extensive use, maintaining onion quality during storage is crucial for maximizing both economic returns and ensuring consumer satisfaction.

In response to market demands, a wide range of cultivars has been developed globally with a focus on climate adaptability and postharvest storability (Havey, 2018). In East Asia, breeding efforts have targeted day-neutral and intermediate-day cultivars to improve local adaptability, yield, and storage quality (Kim et al., 2009). Despite these efforts, onions remain vulnerable to physiological deterioration during storage, including sprouting, browning, microbial spoilage, weight loss, and softening, which significantly reduce marketability (Petropoulos et al., 2017). These storage-related changes are closely linked to metabolic activities and the associated shifts in metabolite profiles (Chávez-Mendoza et al., 2016). Recent studies have applied metabolomics using analytical platforms such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) has been employed to investigate metabolite profiles in onions across cultivars (Böttcher et al., 2017), red onion genotypes (Metrani et al., 2020), and during storage (Saviano et al., 2019), as well as in onion by-products (Elattar et al., 2024). However, despite the known effects of cultivar, cultivation region, and environmental conditions on quality and storability (Petropoulos et al., 2017; Vintila et al., 2014), metabolomics-based research integrating these variables remains limited. In particular, integrative methodologies assessing cultivar, cultivation region, and storage period in onion metabolomics are rarely studied.

Therefore, this study aimed to compare the quality changes during storage among onion cultivars grown in different regions and to elucidate the physiological and metabolic responses associated with cultivar- and region-specific variation through metabolite profiling at both early and late storage stages. The findings are expected to provide insights into the mechanisms underlying storage-related quality deterioration and inform strategies for improved postharvest management of onions. These findings may address current deficiencies and offer a novel structure for enhancing postharvest practices among producers and storage administrators.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Sample preparation

The onions used in this study included the cultivars Katamaru (K1 and K2) and Newmars (N1) cultivated in Mungyeong, Gyeongsangbuk-do, and the cultivars Newmars (N2) and Terius (T) cultivated in Hamyang, Gyeongsangnam-do, respectively. After harvest, the onions were cured under forced-air (ambient temperature for 2 weeks) and stored in cold storage maintained at 0-1°C and 80-90% relative humidity, and quality assessments were conducted every two months during storage. Quality assessments were performed at two-month intervals during the storage period.

2.2. Measurement of respiration rate

During storage, the respiration rate of onions was measured by placing a single bulb in a sealed container (1,380 mL) inside the cold storage room and allowing it to respire for 1 h. A 1 mL sample of the accumulated headspace gas was collected using a gas-tight syringe and analyzed using gas chromatography (GC, HP7890B, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with an HP-5 column (30 m× 0.32 mm, Agilent Technologies) and a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). The GC oven temperature and carrier gas flow rate were set to 80°C and 5 mL/min, respectively. The respiration rate was expressed as mg CO2/kg · h (Yang et al., 2023).

2.3. Measurement of weight loss, firmness, soluble solids content, and moisture content

The weight loss of onions was calculated by measuring the weight of ten bulbs per cultivar at two-month intervals and expressing the reduction as a percentage of the initial weight.

The firmness of onion flesh was measured at the equatorial zone using a texture analyzer (TA 1, LLOYD Instruments, Ametek Inc., Fareham, UK) equipped with a 5 mm-diameter cylindrical probe. Measurements were performed at a penetration speed of 2 mm/s with a strain of 10 mm. Ten samples were analyzed per treatment.

Soluble solids content (SSC) was measured by juicing the onion flesh and analyzing the extract using a digital refractometer (PAL-1, Atago Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

Moisture content was calculated as a percentage by measuring the weight loss of 5 g of onion flesh after drying at 105°C for 24 h.

2.4. Measurement of color value

The color of onion flesh was measured at the equatorial zone using a color meter (CR-300, Minolta Co., Tokyo, Japan) to obtain L* (lightness), a* (redness), and b* (yellowness) values. The whiteness index (WI) and browning index (BI) of the scales were calculated using the following equations (Kim et al., 2022):

BI = 100  ×   x 0.31 0.17

where x=a*+1.75L*5.645×L*+a*3.012b*

WI = 100 -  100 L* 2 + a * 2 + b * 2
2.5. Metabolite analysis using ultra-performances liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight MS (UPLC-Q-TOF MS)

Metabolites in onion flesh were extracted by adding 0.8 mL of 80% methanol containing an internal standard (zidovudine, Sigma-Aldrich) to 0.04 g of freeze-dried onion powder. The mixture was vortexed and homogenized using bullet blender. After centrifugation (14,000 ×g for 10 min), clear supernatant was injected to a UPLC-Q-TOF MS system (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA). Metabolites were separated on an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.7 μm; Waters) with a mobile phase consisting of water with 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (B). The flow rate was 0.35 mL/min, and the column temperature was maintained at 40°C. Eluted metabolites were detected using a Q-TOF MS operated in negative electrospray ionization (ESI) mode. MS data were acquired under the following conditions: scan range of m/z 100-1,500, scan time of 0.2 sec, capillary voltage of 3 kV, sampling cone voltage of 30 V, desolvation gas flow of 800 L/h at 350°C, and source temperature of 120°C. Leucine-enkephalin ([M-H] = 554.2615) was used as the lock mass at a flow rate of 20 μL/min and injected every 10 sec to ensure mass accuracy. To monitor instrument stability, a pooled quality control (QC) sample was injected after every 10 samples. MS/MS spectra were acquired with a collision energy ramp from 10 to 30 eV and a scan range of m/z 50-1,500 (Lee et al., 2023).

LC-MS data collection, normalization, and alignment were performed using MarkerLynx software (Waters). Peak detection parameters included a peak-to-peak baseline noise of 1, noise elimination level of 6, peak width of 1 sec at 5% height, and intensity threshold of 10,000. Peaks were aligned using a mass window of 0.05 Da and a retention time window of 0.2 min. All data were normalized using the internal standard. Metabolite identification was performed using the authentic standards, UNIFI platform (version 1.8.2.169, Waters) linked to the ChemSpider databases, and METLIN database (metlin.scripps.edu). Identification levels were assigned according to the Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI), with most compounds corresponding to Level 2 (Fiehn et al., 2007). No authentic standards were used unless otherwise stated.

2.6. Statistical analysis

SIMCA-P+ version 21.0.1 (Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden) was used to statistically analyze the dataset obtained from UPLC-Q-TOF MS. In particular, partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was performed to visualize classification patterns, and the model was evaluated using R2X, R2Y, Q2, and permutation tests. In addition, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan’s multiple range test was conducted using SPSS version 28.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) to evaluate statistical significance at a level of p<0.05. Pearson correlation coefficients between metabolites and quality were calculated using GraphPad Prism 11.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Quality changes during storage

Changes in respiration rate during storage are presented in Fig. 1A. At the beginning of storage, the N1 onions exhibited the highest respiration rate (11.2±1.8 mg CO2/kg · h), which gradually declined to the lowest level among all samples by 8 months. In contrast, statistically significant differences were noted for K2 at 2 months and K1 at 4 months (p<0.05); however, the overall respiration rate variation among cultivars was minimal, between 5.1 and 5.7 μmol CO2/kg · h. The initially high respiration rate in N1 onions may have resulted from postharvest conditions such as temperature and humidity, harvest timing, or differences in curing duration (Benkeblia et al., 2000; Sharma et al., 2025). In general, onions with higher respiration rates tend to exhibit greater weight loss during storage and increased hormonal activity, which may induce physiological disorders such as sprouting and rooting (Sharma et al., 2025). Previous studies have also reported that even within the same cultivar, differences in climate at harvest and postharvest handling practices can significantly influence metabolic activity and respiration during storage (Benkeblia et al., 2000; Rahmah et al., 2023).

kjfp-32-5-776-g1
Fig. 1. Respiration rate (A), weight loss (B), firmness (C), soluble solids content (SSC, D), and water content (E) of onion cultivars during storage for 8 months. The different uppercase letters (A-C) at each point indicate significant differences among cultivars, while different lowercase letters within a cultivar indicate significant differences during storage, based on ANOVA with Duncan’s multiple range test (p<0.05). The absence of letters indicated no significant differences. K, Katamaru; N, New Mars, T, Terius.
Download Original Figure

Under the storage conditions used in this study, decay rate remained below 3% in all samples throughout the 8 months of storage period (data not shown). In contrast, weight loss showed marked variation across cultivars and cultivation regions, particularly after 6 mon of storage. At 6 and 8 mon, cultivar T exhibited the lowest weight loss (2.9% and 4.7%, respectively), while K2 and N2 showed the highest losses (Fig. 1B). Weight loss during storage typically results from water loss due to transpiration (Sekara et al., 2017), and respiration is closely associated with this process (Suravi et al., 2024). The variations in weight loss among cultivars under uniform storage conditions may indicate inherent physiological and preharvest disparities among cultivars (Rahaman et al., 2021). Notably, the low respiration rate and weight loss in N1 onions at 8 mon imply that reduced respiration may have mitigated moisture loss during later storage phases.

Regarding firmness, no statistically significant differences were observed among cultivars or cultivation regions throughout the storage period, although all samples showed a general decrease in firmness (Fig. 1C). This reduction is primarily attributed to tissue softening caused by enzymatic degradation of structural polysaccharides by softening enzymes such as pectin methylesterase (PME), polygalacturonase (PG), and β-galactosidase (Coolong et al., 2008; Kang, 2024). Although enzymatic activity was not evaluated in this study, previous studies have shown that the activity of these enzymes can be affected by cultivar and cultivation conditions (Liu et al., 2019; Hou et al., 2022), and more prominently by postharvest treatments and storage temperature (Bu et al., 2013; Chope et al., 2012; Kang et al., 2024).

SSC increased slightly in K2 onion up to 4 months, followed by a decrease. In other cultivars, SSC generally decreased after 2 or 4 months of storage (Fig. 1D). At 8 months, K2 exhibited the lowest SSC value (6.1±0.4%). Such reductions in SSC during storage are typically attributed to the metabolic consumption of soluble carbohydrates as carbon sources and energy donors for the synthesis of amino acids, organic acids, and other intermediates (Romo-Pérez et al., 2020).

Moisture content ranged from 89.7% to 94.4% across all cultivars during storage (Fig. 1E). Although statistically significant differences were observed, these were attributed to biological variation among individual bulbs. Overall, moisture levels were consistent with previously reported ranges for stored onions (Jolayemi et al., 2018; Park et al., 2024).

Color changes in onion during storage are shown in Fig. 2. L* values varied among onion cultivars during storage (p<0.05), with stability over time, except for N2 onions, which exhibited a significant increase after 4 months (p<0.05). Similarly, a* value decreased only in N2 onions after 6 months. The BI value of N2 onion also decrease after 4 months (p<0.05). Among the cultivars, K2 onion consistently exhibited lower L* values during storage, whereas N1 onion had relatively higher L* and lower a* values. While the complex mechanisms underlying these color changes were not specifically investigated, such variations may be linked to cultivar-specific physiological responses to extended storage, including changes in tissue hydration, cellular structure, or membrane integrity (Petropoulos et al., 2017; Szymańska et al., 2012).

kjfp-32-5-776-g2
Fig. 2. Changes in color values of onion cultivars during storage for 8 months. (A), lightness (L*); (B), redness (a*); (C), yellowness (b*); (D), whiteness index (WI); (E), browning index (BI). The different uppercase letters at each point indicate significant differences among cultivars, while different lowercase letters within a cultivar indicate significant differences during storage, based on ANOVA with Duncan’s multiple range test (p<0.05). The absence of letters indicated no significant differences. K, Katamaru; N, New Mars, T, Terius.
Download Original Figure
3.2. Metabolomic analysis

Metabolite profiles in onion flesh were analyzed using UPLC-Q-TOF MS to compare metabolomic differences between the early and final stages of storage across cultivars and cultivation regions. Multivariate statistical analysis was used to visualize metabolomic differences between the early and late storage stages across different cultivars and regions (Fig. 3). Quality parameters of the applied PLS-DA models indicated that R2X and R2Y ranged from 0.420 to 0.734 and 0.191 to 0.984, respectively. The Q2 values ranged from 0.124 to 0.990, reflecting variation in model predictability across cultivars and storage stages. In particular, some groups (e.g., Fig. 3D) exhibited low Q2 and less typical permutation test distributions, suggesting that the statistical robustness of the separation may vary across models (Ström and Wheelock, 2024).

kjfp-32-5-776-g3
Fig. 3. Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) score plots of onion metabolites and their quality parameters. The statistical acceptability of PLS-DA models was evaluated by R2X, R2Y, Q2, and p-value, and validated by cross validation with a permutation test (n=200). (A), PLS-DA score plots for all cultivars; (B), individual cultivars; (C), the early stage of each cultivar; (D), final storage period of each cultivar. K, Katamaru; N, New Mars, T, Terius.
Download Original Figure

Despite these limitations, PLS-DA score plots showed discernible clustering trends in some cultivar and cultivation region. Based on variable importance in the projection (VIP) values (>0.7) and p-values (<0.05), a total of 28 metabolites, including sugars, amino acids, peptides, organic acids, phenolic compounds, and saponins, were identified as key contributors to these differences (Table 1). Moreover, nine metabolites were also identified that did not meet the VIP and p-value but were either abundant in onion samples or showed substantial variation during storage in specific groups. Similar metabolite profiles have been reported in previous studies on onion metabolomics and UPLC-Q-TOF MS analyses (Böttcher et al., 2017; Matsuse et al., 2022; Zhou et al., 2020).

Table 1. Tentative identification of major citrus peel metabolites analyzed using UPLC-Q-TOF MS and their fold changes
RT1) Compound Exact mass (m/z) MS fragment MSI2) level3) Adducts VIP4) p-value5) Fold changes (vs. early stage of storage)
K16) K2 N1 N2 T
0.65 Arginine 173.0997 88, 131, 156 1 M-H 1.23 2.44 × 10−5 1.40 1.70 1.14 1.62 3.86
0.66 Glutamine 145.0572 88, 102, 127 1 M-H 1.46 1.91 × 10−4 −1.45 −1.28 −1.02 −1.79 −1.20
0.72 Alliin 176.0342 150 1 M-H 1.20 4.65 × 10−4 −1.69 −1.77 −1.15 −1.49 −1.40
0.74 Sucrose 341.1056 59, 179, 209, 221 1 M-H 1.15 5.50 × 10−2 −1.05 1.44 1.19 1.26 3.09
0.77 Maltopentose 827.2671 545 2 M-H 0.85 2.81 × 10−2 2.81 4.65 4.15 2.42 6.06
0.80 Malic acid 133.0099 115 1 M-H 1.27 6.08 × 10−2 −3.76 1.20 −1.38 −1.78 −1.38
0.87 Citric acid 191.0152 87, 173 1 M-H 1.22 6.09 × 10−4 1.31 2.53 1.34 1.52 2.87
0.98 Cellotriose 503.1594 101, 179, 221, 251, 323, 341 2 M-H 0.76 2.49 × 10−2 3.11 5.98 1.77 1.77 6.91
1.00 di-Galactosyl pinitol 549.1657 101, 179, 251, 341, 503 2 M-H 0.68 3.41 × 10−2 1.80 7.29 2.72 2.44 5.64
1.06 Isocitric acid 191.0152 87, 173 2 M-H 1.12 1.13 × 10−1 −1.24 1.97 1.14 1.33 2.71
1.19 N-Acetyldehydroalanine 128.0304 3 M-H 1.33 6.69 × 10−2 −1.83 −1.03 −1.20 −1.17 1.45
1.24 Gly-l-Pro 171.0722 153 2 M-H 1.13 1.17 × 10−5 18.58 92.56 10.29 39.53 +
1.25 γ-L-Gln-S-(1-propenyl)-Cys sulfoxide 305.0769 171, 215, 264 2 M-H 1.18 2.43 × 10−6 1.73 7.92 7.39 3.34 8.74
1.70 Pyroglutamic acid 128.0316 1 M-H 0.47 3.36 × 10−1 1.96 5.08 2.40 2.93 18.57
1.71 Met-Asp 263.0652 3 M-H 0.97 3.59 × 10−5 62.36 3.42 29.40 45.15 283.21
1.86 Leucine 130.0817 1 M-H 0.46 9.42 × 10−2 −17.61 −3.04 −1.74 −7.88 −18.84
2.44 N-Acetylcystathionine 263.065 128 2 M-H 1.00 1.38 × 10−3 −3.05 −1.85 1.10 −1.36 −2.94
2.62 Boc-Gln-Oh 245.1089 143, 99 2 M-H 1.26 6.82 × 10−6 3.98 13.62 2.77 4.88 93.74
2.64 Dihydrotanshinone I 277.0812 3 M-H 1.26 7.37 × 10−8 2.57 4.25 2.50 3.24 17.53
2.66 Phenylalanine 164.066 1 M-H 1.09 1.63 × 10−3 −1.34 1.07 −1.25 −1.06 1.58
2.73 Glutathione glycylmethyl ester 392.1088 99, 143, 254, 272, 306, 374 2 M-H 1.29 1.12 × 10−10 2.68 3.16 1.38 2.11 14.60
3.09 Tryptophan 203.0768 1 M-H 0.52 6.57 × 10−1 2.37 4.97 1.50 2.29 26.11
3.13 L-γ-Gln-L-Leu 259.1245 128, 230 197, 223, 241 2 M-H 1.19 1.83 × 10−4 −1.67 −19.39 −6.57 2.29 22.19
3.20 Delphinidin-3-O-β-glucopyranoside 465.1009 303, 125, 177 2 M-H 0.33 7.78 × 10−1 1.00 1.83 1.26 1.14 3.74
3.22 Glutamyl-S-allylcysteine 289.0814 73, 86, 160, 171 2 M-H 1.33 1.30 × 10−6 2.53 4.66 1.45 2.62 43.85
3.36 Gln-Phe 293.1091 128, 147, 164, 249, 257, 275 2 M-H 1.39 2.72 × 10−5 1.07 1.52 1.31 1.12 1.37
3.61 Quercetin 3,4’-diglucoside 625.1405 301, 463, 609 1 M-H 0.66 2.38 × 10−1 −1.25 −1.08 1.09 −1.09 −1.19
3.69 Astragaloside 639.1568 285, 313, 446, 476, 519, 609 2 M-H 1.09 1.04 × 10−3 −2.11 −1.33 −1.97 −1.62 −1.90
3.84 Met-Glu-Cys 380.0916 99, 128, 143 2 M-H 1.21 1.25 × 10−4 −2.17 −2.35 −2.91 −2.49 −2.17
4.22 Ascaloniside A2 963.4846 609, 771 2 HCOO- 0.70 1.56 × 10−2 −9.49 −1.20 −3.06 −8.30 −4.12
4.27 Isorhamnetin 3-glucoside 477.1009 299, 314 2 M-H 0.52 3.75 × 10−2 1.14 1.51 1.24 1.44 −1.81
4.33 Quercetin-4’-glucoside 463.0857 151, 300, 301 1 M-H 0.39 5.10 × 10−1 −1.18 1.03 1.41 1.09 −1.03
4.35 Schidigera saponin F1 933.4742 741 2 HCOO- 0.47 8.69 × 10−2 −4.21 1.36 −1.26 −2.90 −2.39
4.48 Nepitrin 477.1016 299, 314 2 M-H 0.81 6.68 × 10−2 −1.49 −1.02 −1.27 −1.15 −1.58
4.86 Rhaponticin 419.1313 121, 228, 257, 287 2 M-H 0.82 5.10 × 10−3 −1.68 −1.16 1.08 −1.22 −1.40
4.87 Auriculoside 449.1421 257, 419 2 M-H 1.11 5.22 × 10−3 −1.71 −1.50 −1.48 −1.25 1.06
5.00 Quercetin 301.0296 93, 151, 243, 245 1 M-H 0.93 2.00 × 10−1 −1.50 −2.02 1.14 1.46 1.12

RT, retention time.

MSI, metabolomics standards initiative.

MSI levels are assigned according to the metabolomics standards initiative. Level 1, confirmed with authentic standards; Level 2, presumptive identification through MS/MS matching; Level 3, tentative identification based solely on accurate mass.

VIP, variable importance in the projection.

p-values were analyzed by ANOVA with Duncan’s multiple range test.

K, Katamaru; N, New Mars, T, Terius.

Download Excel Table
3.3. Metabolomic pathway and relative abundance of identified metabolites

Metabolomic pathways associated with changes during onion storage were proposed based on the identified metabolites using the KEGG database (https://www.kegg.jp/), and relative abundances were compared (Table 1 and Fig. 4). Among primary metabolites related to glycolysis and the TCA cycle, sucrose increased 3.09-fold in T onion at the final storage stage. oligosaccharides such as cellotriose, galactosyl pinitol, and maltopentose increased over 1.77-fold in all onions, with more than 4.65-fold increases in K2 and T onions. These sugar accumulations are likely linked to structural polysaccharide degradation (e.g., pectin), associated with firmness reduction. In this study, the structural polysaccharide degradation products di-galactosyl pinitol, cellotriose, and maltopentose showed a weak negative correlation with firmness (r=−0.328 to −0.220). Nonetheless, previous studies have demonstrated that oligosaccharides are produced as a result of enzymatic degradation, such as β- galactosidase, PME, and PG of structural polysaccharides, and these mechanisms have been associated with a reduction in firmness during the storage of onions (Bu et al., 2013; Chope et al., 2012; Coolong et al., 2008; Kang, 2024).

kjfp-32-5-776-g4
Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of the metabolomic pathway and relative abundance of onion metabolites. Y-axis indicates the normalized chromatogram intensity and X-axis indicates the early (E) and final (F) storage period (8 months) of onion cultivars. K, Katamaru; N, New Mars, T, Terius.
Download Original Figure

Regarding organic acids, malic acid decreased during storage in all onions except N1, whereas citric acid increased in all, with a sharp 2.87-fold rise in T onion. Isocitric acid also increased most in T onion. These trends reflect sustained TCA cycle activity and ongoing energy metabolism during storage (Akram, 2014; Shivakumar, 2014). Differential accumulation of intermediates like citric and isocitric acids may influence biosynthetic pathways and overall metabolic activity across cultivars and regions (Kumari, 2023).

Amino acids and peptides associated with glycolysis and the TCA cycle, including arginine, pyroglutamic acid, Boc-Gln-OH, and Gln-Phe, increased in all onions. In T onion, arginine, pyroglutamic acid, Boc-Gln-OH, and L-γ-Gln-L-Leu increased sharply (3.86 to 93.74-fold), while glutamine decreased in K1, K2, N2, and T onions. L-γ-Gln-L-Leu notably decreased in K2 (-19.39-fold). These shifts are linked to activation of stress-responsive metabolomic pathways (Chilukuri et al., 2018) and may be affected by initial cultivar and region-specific qualities (Böttcher et al., 2018; Hansen et al., 2001; Jo et al., 2016). Arginine and pyroglutamic acid contribute to osmotic and antioxidant responses, while changes in amino acids and peptides may influence onion flavor (Taglienti et al., 2020).

The phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) pathway, associated with phenylpropanoid and flavonoid biosynthesis, plays roles in plant antioxidant defense and stress response (Kumar et al., 2023; Sharma et al., 2019). In this study, phenylalanine increased only in T onion, while tryptophan increased 4.97- and 26.11-fold in K2 and T onions. Dihydrotanshinone I increased over 1.5-fold in all samples, peaking in T onion (17.53-fold). Delphinidin-3-O-β-glucopyranoside, a minor anthocyanin in yellow onions, rose 3.74-fold in T onion. These changes suggest selective activation of defense pathways based on initial physiological traits. Meanwhile, auriculoside and quercetin decreased in K1 and K2 onions (1.71 and 2.02-fold), likely due to antioxidant utilization or conversion (Lachman et al., 2003; Sharma et al., 2015).

Saponin compounds such as astragaloside, ascaloniside A2, and schidigera saponin F1 generally showed a decreasing trend during storage across most onion samples. In particular, ascaloniside A2 markedly decreased in K1, N1, N2, and T onions by −9.49, −3.06, −8.30, and −4.12-fold, respectively, while schidigera saponin F1 decreased by −4.21, −2.90, and −2.39-fold in K1, N2, and T onions, respectively. Research on saponin accumulation and changes in onions is limited compared to other Allium species. However, saponin biosynthesis in plants is known to be strongly influenced by various environmental factors, including genotype, microclimate, soil fertility, and cultivation practices (Ariyanti and Latifa, 2021; Szakiel et al., 2011). Furthermore, due to their complex molecular structures, saponins can degrade over time if optimal storage conditions are not maintained (Kim et al., 2008).

Organosulfur compounds and some amino acids and in the cysteine-methionine pathway play roles in stress defense and flavor (Künstler et al., 2020). Alliin, N-acetylcystathionine, N-acetyldehydroalanine, and Met-Glu-Cys decreased during storage, with N-acetylcystathionine showing notable reductions in K1 and T onions (−3.05 and −2.94-fold). Met-Glu-Cys decreased more than −2.17-fold in all onions. In contrast, Gly-l-Pro, L-Gln-S-(1-propenyl)-Cys sulfoxide, Met-Asp, glutathione glycylmethyl ester, and glutamyl-S-allylcysteine increased significantly, especially in T onion. As these metabolites were not confirmed with authentic standards, future studies should validate their identities to strengthen confidence in their functional interpretation. Nevertheless, these increases reflect enhanced antioxidant defenses and physiological regulation under oxidative stress (Künstler et al., 2020). Decreased compounds may have been used as precursors or intermediates in thiosulfinate biosynthesis, linked to pungency development (Kamata et al., 2016). Pungency was not directly assessed in this study; however, previous studies have reported that sulfur-containing compounds, such as alliin, are positively associated with pungency in Allium species due to their involvement in the thiosulfinate biosynthetic pathway (Ammarellou, 2024; Benkeblia and Lanzotti, 2007). Additionally, such divergent changes across cultivars suggest directed regulation of sulfur metabolism, reflecting cultivar-specific physiological responses (Kamata et al., 2016).

Overall, metabolic changes during storage were primarily observed in glycolysis, the TCA cycle, phenylpropanoid, and cysteine-methionine pathways. The absence of Level 1 confirmation for key metabolites is a limitation that future studies should address. Despite this, the shifts in sugars, organic acids, and amino acids point to active energy metabolism and stress responses, especially in T onion. Selective accumulation of functional metabolites suggests differential regulation of antioxidant and defense-related pathways across cultivars and regions (Böttcher et al., 2017; Saviano et al., 2019).

4. Conclusions

This study investigated quality and metabolite changes in onion bulbs during storage by analyzing identified metabolites across different cultivars and regions. During storage, physiological indicators such as respiration rate, weight loss, and firmness showed a general decline, with slight but statistically significant differences depending on cultivar and cultivation region. Metabolomic analysis revealed that sugars, organic acids, amino acids, and organosulfur compounds were the major metabolite classes affected by storage, with particularly notable changes observed in the T onion. Among these, oligosaccharide accumulation coincided with firmness reduction, and significant changes were observed in organosulfur compounds involved in the biosynthetic pathway of pungency. These results revealed cultivar- and region-dependent alterations in primary and secondary metabolic pathways. Further studies are needed to elucidate how key metabolites contribute to texture and flavor regulation and how they respond to environmental and preharvest influences during storage. Nevertheless, the findings are expected to enhance understanding of storage-related quality deterioration and contribute to developing improved postharvest management strategies for onions.

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflict of interests

Jinsu Lee has served as an editor of Food Science and Preservation since 2025, but was not involved in the review process or decision-making for this manuscript. Otherwise, no relevant conflicts of interest have been reported.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Kim DS, Lee JG. Methodology: Kim DS, Lee JH. Formal analysis: Park DG, Yun YE, Jang YJ, Han JW. Validation: Kim DS, Lim S, Cho JH, Lee JS, Han JW. Writing - original draft: Kim DS, Lee JG. Writing - review & editing: Kim DS.

Ethics approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

Funding

This study was supported by the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture, Science, and Technology Development (Project No. PJ017191) of the Rural Development Administration of the Republic of Korea.

References

1.

Akram M. Citric acid cycle and role of its intermediates in metabolism. Cell Biochem Biophys. 68:475-478 2014;

2.

Ammarellou A. Pungency related gene network in Allium sativum L., response to sulfur treatments. BMC Genom data. 25:35 2024;

3.

Ariyanti NA, Latifa S. Saponins accumulation and antimicrobial activities on shallot (Allium cepa L.) from marginal land. J Agro. 8:188-198 2021;

4.

Benkeblia N, Lanzotti V. Allium thiosulfinates: Chemistry, biological properties and their potential utilization in food preservation. Food. 1:193-201 2007;

5.

Benkeblia N, Varoquaux P, Gouble B, Selselet-Attou G. Respiratory parameters of onion bulbs (Allium cepa) during storage. Effects of ionising radiation and temperature. J Sci Food Agric. 80:1772-1778 2000;

6.

Böttcher C, Krähmer A, Stürtz M, Widder S, Schulz H. Comprehensive metabolite profiling of onion bulbs (Allium cepa) using liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Metabolomics. 13:35 2017;

7.

Böttcher C, Krähmer A, Stürtz M, Widder S, Schulz H. Effect of cultivar and cultivation year on the metabolite profile of onion bulbs (Allium cepa L.). J Agric Food Chem. 66:3229-3238 2018;

8.

Bu J, Yu Y, Aisikaer G, Ying T. Postharvest UV-C irradiation inhibits the production of ethylene andthe activity of cell wall-degrading enzymes during softening of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol. 86:337-345 2013;

9.

Chávez-Mnedoza C, Vega-García MO, Guevara-Aguilar A, Sánchez E, Alvarado-González M, Flores-Córdova MA. Effect of prolonged storage in controlled atmospheres on the conservation of the onion (Allium cepa L.) quality. Emir J Food Agric. 28:842-852 2016;

10.

Chilukuri H, Kulkarni MJ, Fernandes M. Revisiting amino acids and peptides as anti-glycation agents. MedChem Comm. 9:614-624 2018;

11.

Chope GA, Cools K, Hammond JP, Thompson AJ, Terry LA. Physiological, biochemical and transcriptional analysis of onion bulbs during storage. Ann Bot. 109:819-831 2012;

12.

Coolong TW, Randle WM, Wicker L. Structural and chemical differences in the cell wall regions in relation to scale firmness of three onion (Allium cepa L.) selections at harvest and during storage. J Sci Food Agric. 88:1277-1286 2008;

13.

FAO Agricultural Production and Statistics 2000-2002. FAOSTAT Analytical Briefs, No. 79. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. p:9-10 2023;

14.

Fiehn O, Robertson D, Griffin J, Werf M, Nikolau B, Morrison N, Summer LW, Goodacre R, Hardy NW, Taylor C, Fostel J, Kristal B, Kaddurah-Daouk R, Mendes P, Ommen B, Lindon J, Sansone SA. The metabolomics standards initiative (MSI). Metabolomics. 3:175-178 2007;

15.

Griggiths G, Trueman L, Crowther T, Thomas B, Smith B. Onions: A global benefit to health. Phytother Res. 16:603-615 2002;

16.

Hansen SL. Content of free amino acids in onion (Allium cepa L.) as influenced by the stage of development at harvest and long-term storage. Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci. 51:77-83 2001;

17.

Havey MJ. Onion breeding. In: Plant Breeding Reviews. In: Goldman I, editor.EditorJohn Wiley & Sons Inc. NY, USA: p p. 39-85 2018;

18.

Hou J, Riaz M, Yan L, Lu K, Jiang C. Effect of exogenous L-aspartate nano‑calcium on root growth, calcium forms and cell wall metabolism of Brassica napus L. NanoImpact. 27:100415 2022;

19.

Jo H, Surh J. Influence of sulfur fertilization on quality characteristics and antioxidant activities of onions during storage at 4°C. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 45:1776-1783 2016;

20.

Jolayemi OS, Nassarawa SS, Lawal MO, Sodipo MA, Oluwalana IB. Monitoring the changes in chemical properties of red and white onions (Allium cepa) during storage. J Stored Prod Postharvest Res. 9:78-86 2018;

21.

Kamata Y, Aoyagi M, Sawada Y, Nakabayashi R, Hirai MY, Saito K, Imai S. Changes in trans-S‑1-propenyl‑L‑cysteine sulfoxide and related sulfur-containing amino acids during onion storage. J Agric Food Chem. 64:9063-9071 2016;

22.

Kang OJ. Effect of various calcium salts for the prevention of the onion (Allium cepa L.) tissue softening. J East Asian Soc Diet Life. 34:365-378 2024;

23.

Kim DS, Kim QW, Kim H, Kim HJ. Changes in the chemical, physical, and sensory properties of rice according to its germination rate. Food Chem. 388:133060 2022;

24.

Kim JS, Yean MH, Lee EJ, Kang SS. Phytochemical studies on astragalus root (1): Saponins. Nat Prod Sci. 14:37-46 2008;

25.

Kim S, Lee ET, Kim CW, Yoon MK. Distribution of three cytoplasm types in onion (Allium cepa L.) cultivars bred in Korea and Japan. Hortic Sci Technol. 27:275-279 2009;

26.

Kumar AP, Bhasker K, Nikhil BSK, Srinivas P. Role of phenylpropanoids and flavonoids in plant defense mechanism. Int J Environ Clim Change. 13:2951-2960 2023;

27.

Kumari A. Citric acid cycle. In: Sweet Biochemistry: Remembering Structures, Cycles, and Pathways by Mnemonics. Elsevier. Amsterdam, Netherlands: p p. 9-15 2023;

28.

Künstler A, Gullner G, Ádám AL, Nagy JK, Király L. The versatile roles of sulfur-containing biomolecules in plant defense: A road to disease resistance. Plants. 9:1705 2020;

29.

Lachman J, Pronek D, Hejtmánková A, Dudjak J, Pivec V, Faitová K. Total polyphenol and main flavonoid antioxidants in different onion (Allium cepa L.) varieties. Hort Sci. 30:142-147 2003;

30.

Lee S, Jo SH, An JH, Jeong S, Kim DS, Kim SS, Park SM, Yun SH, Han SG, Kim HJ. Chemical profile and antioxidant activity of peel of yellowball, a novel citrus variety. Korean J Food Preserv. 30:235-246 2023;

31.

Liu J, Liang L, Jiang Y, Chen J. Changes in metabolisms of antioxidant and cell wall in three pummelo cultivars during postharvest storage. Biomolecules. 9:319 2019;

32.

Matsuse K, Abdelrahman M, Ariyanti NA, Tsuji F, Hirata S, Nakajima T, Sato M, Hirai MY, Manochai B, Shigyo M. Targeted metabolome profiling of Indonesian shallots and Japanese long-day/short-day bulb onions. Metabolites. 12:1260 2022;

33.

Metrani R, Singh J, Acharya P, Jayaprakasha GK, Patil BS. Comparative metabolomics profiling of polyphenols, nutrients, and antioxidant activities of two red onion (Allium cepa L.) cultivars. Plants. 9:1077 2020;

34.

Park SJ, Laksana AJ, Kim JY, Kim BS. Effects on the quality characteristics of onions by various packing and loading types during cold storage. Korean J Packag Sci Tech. 30:141-147 2024;

35.

Petropoulos SA, Ntatsi G, Ferreira ICFR. Long-term storage of onion and the factors that affect its quality: A critical review. Food Rev Int. 33:62-83 2017;

36.

Rahaman S, Mandal J, Mohanta S. Field performance and storage losses of onion (Allium cepa L.) under Coastal Saline Zone of West Bengal. J Appl Hortic. 23:188-192 2021;

37.

Rahmah ANF, Priyanti D, Ayuningsih I, Nugraha B. The effect of different storage temperatures and internal analysis of onions with X-Ray CT on the respiration rate of onions. E3S Web Conf. 425:01008 2023;

38.

Ren F, Zhou S. Phenolic components and health beneficial properties of onions. Agriculture. 11:872 2021;

39.

Romo-Pérez ML, Weinert CH, Häußler M, Egert B, Frenchen MA, Trierweiler B, Kulling SE, Zörb G. Metabolite profiling of onion landraces and the cold storage effect. Plant Physiol Biochem. 146:428-437 2020;

40.

Safari S, Engah WRW, Sa’atb NHM, Ghazali NS, Basir MH, Ahmad S. Forecasting Malaysian onion imports using a moving average model and strategies to overcome reliance on a fully imported supply. Rev Food Agric. :97-101 2024;

41.

Sagar NA, Pareek S, Benkeblia N, Xiao J. Onion (Allium cepa L.) bioactives: Chemistry, pharmacotherapeutic functions, and industrial applications. Food Front. 3:380-412 2022;

42.

Saviano G, Paris D, Melck D, Fantasma F, Motta A, Iorizzi M. Metabolite variation in three edible Italian Allium cepa L. by NMR‑based metabolomics: A comparative study in fresh and stored bulbs. Metabolomics. 15:105 2019;

43.

Sekara A, Pokluda R, Vacchio LD, Somma S, Caruso G. Interactions among genotype, environment and agronomic practices on production and quality of storage onion (Allium cepa L.): A review. Hort Sci. 44:21-42 2017;

44.

Sharma A, Shahzad B, Rehman A, Bhardwaj R, Landi M, Zheng B. Response of phenylpropanoid pathway and the role of polyphenols in plants under abiotic stress. Molecules. 24:2452 2019;

45.

Sharma K, Aroor MS, Das S, Bora B, Gupta M, Srivatsan V. Comprehensive review on the current scenarios in onion processing and addressing the grand onion challenge of India. Sci Hort. 345:114152 2025;

46.

Sharma K, Assefa AD, Ko EY, Lee ET, Park SW. Quantitative analysis of flavonoids, sugars, phenylalanine and tryptophan in onion scales during storage under ambient conditions. J Food Sci Technol. 52:2157-2165 2015;

47.

Shivakumar SY. Physio-chemical changes during post harvest handling of onion (Allium cepa L.): A review. Agric Rev. 35:225-232 2014;

48.

Stoica F, Raţu RN, Veleşcu ID, Stanciuc N, Rapeanu G. A comprehensive review on bioactive compounds, health benefits, and potential food applications of onion (Allium cepa L.) skin waste. Trends Food Sci Technol. 141:104173 2023;

49.

Suravi TI, Hasan MK, Jahan I, Shopan J, Saha M, Debnath B, Ahammed GJ. An update on post-harvest loss of onion and employed strategies for remedy. Sci Hort. 338:113794 2024;

50.

Szakiel A, Paczkowski C, Jemry M. Influence of environmental abiotic factors on the content of saponins in plants. Phytochem Rev. 10:471-491 2011;

51.

Szymańska E, Saccenti E, Smilde AK, Westerhuis JA. Double-check: Validation of diagnostic statistics for PLS-DA models in metabolomics studies. Metabolomics. 8:3-16 2012;

52.

Taglienti A, Tiberini A, Ciampa A, Piscopo A, Zappia A, Tomassoli L, Poianab M, Dell’Abate MT. Metabolites response to onion yellow dwarf virus (OYDV) infection in ‘Rossa di Tropea’ onion during storage: A 1H HR-MAS NMR study. J Sci Food Agric. 100:3418-3427 2020;

53.

Vintila M, Niculescu FA, Romas M. Technical aspects regarding the preservation of dry onions in different storage conditions. B UASVM-Food Sci Techol. 71:195-199 2014;

54.

Yang H, Chang MS, Park P, Eum HL, Cho JH, Choi JW, Lim S, Yun YE, Choi HR, Park MH, Hong Y, Lee JH. Effectiveness of controlled atmosphere container on the freshness of exported PMRsupia melon. Food Sci Preserv. 30:822-832 2023;

55.

Yang JS, Kim BS, Kim HN. A causality analysis of the different types of onion prices. JKAIS. 21:440-447 2020;

56.

Zhao XX, Lin FJ, Li H, Li HB, Wu DT, Geng F, Ma W, Wang Y, Miao BH, Gan RY. Recent advances in bioactive compounds, health functions, and safety concerns of onion (Allium cepa L.). Front Nutr. 8:669805 2021;

57.

Zhou Y, Li C, Feng B, Chen B, Jin L, Shen Y. UPLC-ESI-MS/MS based identification and antioxidant, antibacterial, cytotoxic activities of aqueous extracts from storey onion (Allium cepa L var. proliferum Regel). Food Res Int. 130:108969 2020;