Table 4. The phospholipid contents in raw and oven-roasted duck and chicken cut
| Type | Phospholipid (mg/100g FW) | Total PL content (%) in crude fat |
| PE1) | PC1) | SM1) | Total PL1) |
| Duck | Chicken | Duck | Chicken | Duck | Chicken | Duck | Chicken | Duck | Chicken |
| Neck | Raw | 15.7 ±0.22)c3) | 49.7 ±2.4*4),a | 218.9 ±2.8b | 250.4 ±23.1NS5),a | 12.1 ±0.1c | 13.8 ±1.2NS,a | 246.7 ±2.7c | 313.8 ±26.7*,a | 8.57 | 5.21 |
| Oven-roasted | 85.4 ±2.7NS,b | 73.1 ±5.4a | 378.7 ±25.2 NS,c | 375.7 ±8.0a | 23.6 ±0.7d | 26.8 ±1.0*,b | 487.7 ±28.5NS,b | 475.5 ±13.7a | 12.94 | 4.52 |
| Drumette | Raw | 38.0 ±1.5*,b | 24.8 ±1.4d | 230.8 ±4.8*,b | 185.8 ±11.0b | 10.7 ±0.6*,c | 8.8 ±0.1b | 279.6 ±2.6*,b | 219.3 ±12.3b | 4.64 | 6.16 |
| Oven-roasted | 91.8 ±3.1*,ab | 28.7 ±2.4c | 536.7 ±11.0*,a | 182.8 ±14.3c | 39.9 ±0.9*,b | 12.8 ±0.7d | 668.3 ±15.0*,a | 224.4 ±17.3c | 12.47 | 3.63 |
| Wing | Raw | 101.5 ±9.9*,a | 30.3 ±1.8c | 439.8 ±33.9*,a | 204.5 ±4.4b | 27.8 ±2.5*,b | 9.5 ±0.8b | 569.1 ±46.3*,a | 244.3 ±6.6b | 16.89 | 8.37 |
| Oven-roasted | 71.4 ±1.6*,c | 46.3 ±2.3b | 418.0 ±4.2*,b | 338.6 ±20.1b | 29.9 ±0.8*,c | 19.4 ±1.3c | 519.4 ±6.6*,b | 404.2 ±23.7b | 11.34 | 6.10 |
| Skin | Raw | 91.9 ±7.2*,a | 36.4 ±1.8b | 60.2 ±5.6*,c | 35.2 ±2.0c | 32.9 ±1.6*,a | 15.6 ±1.9a | 184.9 ±14.4*,d | 87.1 ±5.6c | 0.31 | 0.25 |
| Oven-roasted | 97.3 ±3.1*,a | 45.7 ±2.0b | 135.6 ±3.3*,d | 89.6 ±2.3d | 53.5 ±1.2*,a | 26.8 ±1.8a | 286.3 ±1.0*,c | 162.1 ±1.1d | 0.72 | 0.38 |
PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PC, phosphatidylcholine; SM, sphingomyelin; Total PL, total phospholipid.
All values are mean±SD (n=3).
Different superscript letters (a-d) within the same row indicate significant differences at p<0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
*Indicates a significant difference between duck and chicken for each PL (PE, PC, SM, and Total PL) within the same row, as determined by Student’s t-test at p<0.05.
NS, not significant difference by Student’s t-test.