Table 2. Microbial reduction in oyster mushrooms after UV-C treatment at different exposure times1)
| Exposure time (sec) | Number of colonies | Microbial reduction |
| Log | Percentage |
| 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h |
| 0 (Control) | 30.67±9.732)a3) | 30.58±9.98a | 31.25±9.63a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 19.33±4.80b | 5.25±1.64b | 1.16±0.43b | 0.20 | 0.77 | 1.43 | 50.66 | 82.83 | 96.28 |
| 30 | 15.42±3.75c | 4.25±1.32c | 0.51±0.10c | 0.30 | 0.86 | 1.79 | 61.52 | 86.10 | 98.36 |
| 40 | 11.08±2.28d | 2.83±0.71d | 0.06±0.03d | 0.44 | 1.03 | 2.73 | 76.58 | 90.74 | 99.81 |
| 50 | 7.58±2.35e | 2.25±0.80e | 0.03±0.01e | 0.61 | 1.13 | 3.09 | 75.84 | 92.64 | 99.92 |
Two-way ANOVA analysis (p<0.05) showed that mean values for different exposure time were significant, whilst insignificant for samples’ positions.
All values are mean±SD.
Different superscript letters (a-e) within a column indicate significant differences at p<0.05 by Tukey’s test.