Table 3. Comparison of biotin content in meats using different extraction methods
| Samples | | Biotin (μg/100 g)1) |
| Non-treated | Pepsin-assisted |
| Meat | Beef, foreshank | 0.779±0.013b2) | 1.523±0.126a |
| Beef, chuck | 0.944±0.012b | 1.038±0.015a |
| Beef, shank | 0.977±0.005b | 1.101±0.028a |
| Pork, ham | 0.632±0.028a | 0.796±0.053a |
| Pork, tenderloin | 1.058±0.024a | 1.151±0.060a |
| Chicken, leg | 1.094±0.013b | 1.979±0.087a |
| Chicken, breast | 1.188±0.111a | 1.117±0.061a |
All values are mean±SD (n=3).
Different superscript letters (a,b) within a row of each same food group under biotin are significantly different by Duncan’s multiple range test at p<0.05.