Table 2. Antioxidant activity of bitter melon extracts obtained by various extraction methods
Extraction method | IC50 value (mg/mL) |
| ABTS radical scavenging activity | Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity | Reducing power | Fe2+ chelating ability |
PUE-E3) | 0.52±0.021)a2) | 1.94±0.02a | 1.23±0.03a | 1.35±0.02a |
PUE-W | 0.75±0.05bc | 2.51±0.07b | 1.61±0.06b | 2.71±0.25c |
BUE-E | 0.64±0.04ab | 2.51±0.09b | 1.33±0.03a | 2.26±0.15b |
AE-W | 0.82±0.05c | 2.90±0.19c | 2.22±0.04d | 4.81±0.16d |
EE | 0.54±0.02a | 2.21±0.07ab | 1.96±0.04c | 1.53±0.18a |
HWE | 1.85±0.13d | 3.16±0.08c | 3.17±0.31e | 5.85±0.24e |
Results are mean and standard deviation (n=3).
Values with different letters in the same column are significantly different at p<0.05 by Duncan’s multiple range test.
PUE-E, probe type-ultrasonic assisted extraction with 60% ethanol; PUE-W, probe type-ultrasonic assisted extraction with water; BUE-E, bath type-ultrasonic assisted extraction with 60% ethanol; AW-E, autoclave extraction with water; EE, 60% ethanol extraction; HWE, hot water extraction.