Table 1. Effect of RV extract on the first fermentation by Leuc. citreum
| RV1)extract(%) | 1st Fermentationtime (days) | pH | Acidity (%) | Viable bacterial count(log CFU/mL) |
| Leuc. citreum |
| 50 | 0 | 4.49±0.032)b3) | 0.12±0.01a | 6.79±0.01a |
| 1 | 4.47±0.03b | 0.18±0.01b | 7.01±0.03b |
| 2 | 4.36±0.01a | 0.19±0.02b | 7.44±0.01c |
| 25 | 0 | 4.51±0.02c | 0.12±0.01a | 7.06±0.02a |
| 1 | 4.37±0.02b | 0.22±0.02b | 8.54±0.02b |
| 2 | 4.29±0.01a | 0.25±0.02c | 8.34±0.01c |
| 15 | 0 | 4.65±0.01c | 0.09±0.03a | 7.01±0.02a |
| 1 | 4.01±0.04b | 0.29±0.01b | 8.63±0.01b |
| 2 | 3.69±0.01a | 0.62±0.01c | 8.66±0.03b |
| 10 | 0 | 4.96±0.01c | 0.09±0.02a | 7.33±0.01a |
| 1 | 3.95.±0.01b | 0.44±0.02b | 8.76±0.01c |
| 2 | 3.81±0.02a | 0.52±0.03c | 8.35±0.04b |
RV extract, Rhus vernicifluum extract.
Values are mean±SD (n=3).
Different letters indicate significant difference at p<0.05 by Duncan’s multiple range test (The lowest value in the sample was expressed as a.).