Table 2. Comparison of hydroxyl radical scavenging activities of fingerroot
| Samples | Scavenging activity1) (%) | IC50(μg/mL) |
| 200 μg/mL | 100 μg/mL | 50 μg/mL | 25 μg/mL | 12.5 μg/mL |
| 80% MeOH ext. | 73.2±0.8a | 59.0±0.7b | 38.5±1.3c | 13.7±1.4e | 5.6±1.3f | 82.3±2.8c |
| 80% EtOH ext. | 53.9±1.1b | 31.2±1.3c | 7.8±2.4e | 5.1±1.1f | 1.1±0.8f | 179.0±1.2b |
| 80% Acetone ext. | 63.9±2.1a | 48.0±0.9b | 20.1±0.4d | 5.8±1.4f | 1.0±1.7f | 123.4±1.3b |
| Hot water ext. | 22.8±1.7d | 11.7±1.8e | 5.5±0.9e | 1.4±1.9f | 0.7±0.1f | >400a |
| (+)-Catechin2) | 88.1±2.1a | 72.3±1.1a | 62.3±1.9b | 40.5±1.5c | 31.1±1.3d | 33.1±1.1c |
Scavenging activities are expressed as the means±SD of triplicate experiments. Different letters (a-f) within the same column indicate significant differences (p<0.05).
(+)-Catechin was used as a positive control.