Table 9. Comparison of micro mineral contents of tomato, paprika and pepper varieties

Sample	Varieties	Fe	Mn	Zn	Cu	Mo	Se
Sample	Varieties	(mg/100 g)	(mg/100 g)	(mg/100 g)	(mg/100 g)	(μg/100 g)	(μg/100 g)
Tomato	Dafnis	0.39±0.02^d¹⁾	0.082±0.00^b	0.13±0.00^f	0.009±0.00^f	5.21±0.12^c	ND²⁾
	244	0.49±0.00^c	0.078±0.00^c^d	0.20±0.00^d	ND	ND	ND
	Bravo TY	0.94±0.01^a	0.126±0.00^a	0.30±0.00^c	0.050±0.00^b	2.92±0.07^d	ND
	Minichal	0.48±0.03^c	0.082±0.00^b^c	0.33±0.01^b	0.046±0.00^c	6.11±0.07^b	ND
	Dotaerang Dia	0.50±0.00^c	0.076±0.00^d	0.18±0.00^e	0.041±0.00^d	9.01±0.76^a	ND
	Jico	0.59±0.00^b	0.049±0.00^e	0.80±0.01^a	0.058±0.00^a	1.86±0.04^e	ND
	Tabol	0.31±0.00^e	0.024±0.00^g	0.13±0.00^g	0.037±0.00^e	0.16±0.02^g	0.97±0.06^a
Paprika	Jacarlo	0.46±0.01^b	0.064±0.01^b	0.33±0.00^a	0.036±0.00^a	3.12±0.17^c	ND
	Nagano	0.47±0.01^b	0.025±0.00^e	0.22±0.00^d	0.014±0.00^c	3.26±0.04^c	ND
	Lunik	0.44±0.02^b	0.113±0.00^a	0.27±0.00^c	0.022±0.00^b	3.11±0.01^c	ND
	Sven	0.41±0.01^b	0.036±0.00^d	0.22±0.00^d	0.016±0.00^c	4.90±0.08^a	ND
	Orandino	0.59±0.14^a	0.054±0.01^c	0.29±0.00^b	0.018±0.00^b^c	3.69±0.06^b	ND
Pepper	Colorjjang	0.74±0.01^a	0.177±0.00^b	0.52±0.01^b	0.109±0.00^a	6.42±0.14^a	ND
	Daekwonseoneon	0.11±0.00^d	0.245±0.00^a	0.72±0.05^a	0.112±0.00^a	5.21±0.53^b	ND
	Gilsang	0.26±0.01^c	0.017±0.00^d	0.29±0.01^c	0.055±0.00^b	4.68±0.13^c	1.00±0.03^b
	Cheongyang	0.40±0.01^b	0.041±0.00^c	0.22±0.02^d	0.052±0.00^b	1.45±0.03^d	1.38±0.04^a

¹⁾All values are expressed as mean±SD of triplicate determinations. Means with different superscripts within a column (a-g) are significantly different at p<0.05 by Duncan’s multiple range test.
²⁾Not detected.