Table 6
Hunter’s color value of the dr ied red papr ika by drying methods
| Samples1) | Hunter color value |
| L | a | b |
| Inside | NRP | 55.55±2.242)b3) | 29.48±3.03a | 29.92±1.48b |
| DRP | 31.28±1.64d | 23.70±2.72b | 12.07±1.92d |
| RPS | 55.98±1.61b | 30.93±1.82a | 33.94±2.14a |
| RPF | 46.14±3.17c | 31.03±2.53a | 22.48±2.11c |
| RPCS | 61.55±2.02a | 31.45±2.93a | 36.09±2.77a |
| Outside | NRP | 39.71±1.70b | 33.04±1.83c | 10.33±1.66d |
| DRP | 30.16±1.56d | 23.10±2.52d | 9.19±1.90d |
| RPS | 40.39±2.92b | 45.40±1.67a | 27.19±2.77a |
| RPF | 36.92±0.98c | 37.86±1.56b | 16.81±2.28c |
| RPCS | 44.52±2.46a | 43.89±1.27a | 22.78±3.75b |
NRP, natural red paprika; DRP, vacuum freeze-dried red paprika; RPS, vacuum freeze-drying of osmotic dried red paprika in sugar; RPF, vacuum freeze-drying of osmotic dried red paprika in sugar and fructose; RPCS, vacuum freeze-drying of osmotic dried red paprika in sugar and corn syrup.
All values are expressed as Mean±SD of triplicate determinations.
Different superscripts within the column are significantly different at p<0.05 by Duncan’s multiple range test.