Table 4.
Sensory evaluation test of Yanggaeng with various contents of Glechoma hederacea powder
| Item | Sensory evaluation score1) |
| Control | Powder content (%) |
| 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
| Viscosity | 2.8±0.62)a3) | 2.7±0.7ab | 2.4±0.5ab | 2.4±0.6ab | 2.4±0.6b |
| Hardness | 3.1±0.9a | 3.1±0.9a | 3.1±0.7a | 2.9±0.8a | 2.9±0.9a |
| Chewiness | 3.6±0.9a | 3.2±0.8ab | 3.1±0.7ab | 2.9±1.1b | 2.6±1.1b |
| Springiness | 3.2±1.1a | 2.9±0.8a | 2.8±0.8a | 2.8±1.0a | 2.9±0.8a |
| Taste | 3.7±0.8a | 3.2±0.7ab | 3.2±0.8ab | 2.8±1.0b | 2.8±1.3b |
| Flavor | 3.1±0.5a | 3.2±0.6a | 3.2±0.6a | 3.1±0.7a | 2.9±0.7a |
| Overall acceptabillity | 3.5±0.5a | 3.0±0.7abc | 3.2±0.8ab | 2.8±0.8bc | 2.5±1.2c |
Sensory evaluation was checked as very good (5 point), slightly good (4 point), normal (3 point), slightly bad (2 point), Very bad (1 point).
Mean±SD
Values with different alphabet in the column were significantly different among group at p<0.05 level by Duncan’s multiple range test.