Table 1. Extraction yields of uRo and uRc under different conditions involving different temperatures (75-100℃) and solvents (aqueous, 5% (v/v) aqueous ethanol, 30% (v/v) aqueous ethanol, and 70%, (v/v) aqueous ethanol)
Name of the extract | Dry matter (%) |
Water extract 100℃ | 5% EtOH extract 100℃ | 30% EtOH extract 90℃ | 70% EtOH extract 70℃ |
uRo1) | Sample 1 | 16.50 | 20.36 | 21.46 | 20.31 |
Sample 2 | 17.10 | 19.87 | 20.50 | 21.33 |
Sample 3 | 16.91 | 21.10 | 22.48 | 21.05 |
Mean±SD | 16.84±0.302) | 20.44±0.61***3) | 21.48±0.99** | 20.90±0.52*** |
uRc | Sample 4 | 18.84 | 19.0 | 22.29 | 19.78 |
Sample 5 | 16.41 | 20.38 | 22.30 | 22.24 |
Sample 6 | 17.68 | 19.23 | 21.71 | 20.93 |
Mean±SD | 17.64±121NS4) | 19.54±0.73NS/NS | 22.1±0.33**/NS | 20.98±1.23*/NS |
Ro | Sample 7 | 4.22 | 6.77 | 7.14 | 7.27 |
1) uRo, unripe Rubus occidentalis L; uRc, unripe Rubus chingii Hu; Ro; ripe Rubus occidentalis L..
2) Data are presented as the mean±SD.
3) The data were statistically evaluated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison test to compare significant differences between the groups at NSp>0.05 (NS=not significant), *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001.
4) Statistically significant from the uRO groups at NSp>0.05.