Table 6. Changes of general components (%) in dried pleurotus eryngii by different drying methods

Drying methods		Pleurotus eryngii
Drying methods		Moisture	Protein	Fat	Ash
Control		89.26±0.20^1)a2)	2.8±0.11^g	0.05±0.00^g	1.00±0.05^b
Sun-drying		11.33±0.08^fg	19.01±0.47^ef	1.00±0.08^cde	4.96±0.17^a
Hot-air drying	40	12.51±0.29^bcd	23.36±0.21^a	1.10±0.05^bcd	5.68±0.03^a
	50	12.04±0.54^de	20.01±.021^de	0.90±0.10^ef	5.26±0.06^a
	60	12.79±0.35^b	21.38±0.07^bcd	1.10±0.03^bcd	6.09±0.30^a
Low temperature vacuum drying	20	12.78±0.46^b	20.49±0.57^cde	1.15±0.03^abc	4.98±0.30^a
	25	12.22±0.06^cde	22.21±0.09^abc	1.05±0.11^cde	5.49±0.08^a
	30	11.88±0.22^e	20.91±0.38^bcd	0.95±0.05^de	5.40±0.13^a
Heat pump dehumidifying drying	30	12.62±0.34^bc	21.51±0.51^abcd	1.30±0.05^a	5.38±0.15^a
	40	11.76±0.49^ef	22.52±0.89^ab	0.75±0.03^f	5.50±0.15^a
	50	11.04±0.06^g	22.16±0.27^abc	1.00±0.05^cde	5.69±0.02^a
Freeze drying		11.03±0.30^g	18.00±0.24^f	1.25±0.06^ab	5.08±0.17^a

¹⁾All values represent mean±SD.
²⁾Means with different letters (^a-g) with in a column are significantly different (p<0.05).