Table 3
Inhibition rates of starch hydrolyzing enzymes in sorghum lines different tannin concentration

Sorghum lines α-amylase α-glucosidase β-glucosidase
-PVP1) +PVP2) -PVP +PVP -PVP +PVP
Control Sorghum var. (Nampungchal) 72.76h3) 4.47k 99.87a -4) 36.87b 25.14ab
Rice (Saechucheong) 5.22m - - - 5.41g 4.23k
Non-tannin lines SL 3 12.18l 12.54f 57.64b 8.74f 12.91f 11.17h
SL 19 16.84k 19.71c 35.70c 2.51g 13.21f 12.20gh
Tannin lines SL 152 52.68j 6.45i 97.64a - 13.86f 9.22i
SL 119 75.26g 15.41e 99.49a 50.74e 33.45c 26.12a
SL 94 82.07bc 8.96h 99.43a - 26.71d 20.15c
SL 140 65.23i 24.37b 99.09a 65.04cd 26.83d 15.34de
SL 135 79.92de 6.45ij 99.91a - 23.43e 13.56fg
SL 36 82.43b 13.97f 99.34a - 26.98d 16.61d
SL 63 75.26g 20.43c 99.86a 74.30b 21.99e 14.80ef
SL 17 72.40h 6.09j 99.34a 67.29c 31.89c 24.11b
SL 85 81.00cd 9.67g 99.49a 60.80d 26.83d 15.63de
SL 160 79.57e 16.12d 99.57a 78.12b 39.54a 24.11b
SL 81 79.57e 4.65k 99.32a 74.76b 22.02e 7.80j
SL 1 77.77f 27.24a 99.37a 84.96a 28.31d 4.88k
SL 70 84.94a 7.88h  99.52a 77.01b  36.14b 19.18c
1)-PVP, No polyvinylpyrrolidone pretreatment.
2)+PVP, 2% polyvinylpyrrolidone pretreatment.
3)Means with different small letters in the same column are significantly (p<0.05) by Duncan's multiple range test.
4)-, No inhibition.