Table 4.
Sensory evaluation test of Yanggaeng with Momordica charantia powder
Item | Sensory evaluation score (point)1) |
Control | Non roasting powder content (%) | Roasting powder content (%) |
0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 |
Color | 3.5a2) | 3.4ab | 3.3ab | 2.9b | 2.5c | 3.6a | 3.4ab | 2.1cd | 1.8d |
Flavor | 3.3b | 3.1bc | 3.0bc | 3.2b | 2.9c | 3.6a | 3.4ab | 2.5c | 1.8d |
Taste | 4.0a | 3.8ab | 3.6b | 3.4c | 3.4c | 4.0a | 4.0a | 2.3b | 1.5c |
Texture | 3.6b | 3.6b | 3.6b | 3.2bc | 3.3bc | 3.8a | 3.5ab | 2.6c | 2.0d |
Overall acceptability | 3.7b | 3.6bc | 3.6bc | 3.4bc | 3.2c | 3.9a | 3.8ab | 2.3c | 1.6d |
Momordica charantia powder was roasted at 180°C. Sensory evaluation was checked as very good (5 point), slightly good (4 point), normal (3 point), slightly bad (2 point), very bad (1 point).
Mean±standard deviation (n=11), means with different superscript letters within row are significantly different at p<0.05 by Duncan’s multiple range tests.