Table 3.
Body weight gain, food intake, food efficiency ratio and water intake of STZ-induced diabetic rats fed the exper imental diets
Experimental groups1) | N | STZ | STZ-M | STZ-G | STZ-MG |
Initial body wt. (g) | 203.88±5.383)NS4) | 196.00±6.26 | 196.75±5.66 | 195.00±5.10 | 194.00±5.27 |
Final body wt. (g) | 332.13±4.94a5) | 241.50±5.70b | 251.13±6.03b | 247.75±7.18b | 2.62±4.10b |
Body weight gain (g/day) | 4.58±0.55a | 1.62±0.37b | 1.94±0.48b | 1.88±0.62b | 2.43±0.39b |
Food intake (g/day) | 29.49±0.37c | 39.22±0.83a | 32.49±0.63b | 32.67±0.69b | 31.84±0.63b |
FER2) (%) | 0.16±0.02a | 0.04±0.01b | 0.06±0.01b | 0.06±0.06b | 0.07±0.04b |
Water intake (mL/day) | 38.25±0.59c | 151.13±2.51a | 106.88±2.97b | 109.25±2.74a | 101.13±3.07b |
N, normal rat+basal control diet; STZ, DM rats++basal control diet; STZ-M, DM rats+feed diet containg 5% mulberry leaf powder; STZ-G, DM rats+feed diet containg 5% green tea powder; STZ-MG, DM rats+feed diet containg 5% mixture of mulberry leaf and green tea powder. and green tea powder
Food efficiency ratio: FER (body weight gain/ food intake).
The results are mean±SE of 8 rats per each group.
The results NS: not significantly different among groups.
Values with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different (p<0.05) between groups by Tukey's test.